Interview in a random and not ill population: If
you have cancer would you like to know?
Accepted 11th
September, 2018
Bruno Henrique Rala de Paula1*,
Rodrigo de Oliveira Almeida2, Eduardo Camargo Millen3,
Fernando Mauro Furtado Coutinho2, Isabela Maciel da Silveira Coutinho
Silva4 and Fernando César de Oliveira Almeida2
1National Cancer Institute,
Universitary Hospital of Vassouras, Clinics Hospital of Volta Redonda, Brazil. 2Universitary Center Oswaldo Aranha Foundation, OncoCentro – Cancer
Treatment Center and Hematological of Volta Redonda, Brazil. 3Brazilian Society of Mastology. 4Radiovida Radiology Clinic, Saint john Baptist Hospital, Clinics
Hospital of Volta Redonda, Brazil.
The incidence of cancer is increasing in absolute and proportional number of
cases. Despite major advances in diagnoses and treatment, disclosure bad news is
often inevitable during the course of the disease. Several protocols have been
developed to increase effectiveness and standardize communication with patients;
however, they are usually based on experiences and reaction of individuals with
known cancer. This study aims to evaluate in a random population of individuals
without the known exposure factor (cancer diagnosis) the predictive factors and
preferences on how to receive the bad news. A survey, containing questions about
demography and formulated by the authors, was applied to passers-by in the city
centre of the countryside of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, from 2014 to 2015.
Subsequently the data was compiled into a Microsoft Excel® version 97 - 2003
table and later exported to the Epi Info® program version 3.5.2 of December,
2010. Of the 1, 201 people interviewed, 1181 met the inclusion criteria. A
majority of 1, 089 (92.6%) would like to be informed of a possible diagnosis of
cancer. Advanced age, low purchasing power and low level of schooling seems to
be related to a greater tendency and preferred not to be informed of the
diagnosis of cancer, as well as, occupations such as human sciences etc
(p<0.05). On the other hand, for occupations such as students, biological and
exact sciences, they prefer to be informed (p<0.05). There was no significant
difference for sex (P = 0.9222) or religion (P = 0.8752). Three hundred and
twenty-five individuals (27.51%) reported some reasons to omit the diagnosis of
cancer to any patient due to: 130 (40%) probable deleterious psychological
effects; 60 (18.46%) might compromise the patient clinical status, 42 (92%) may
cause embarrassment or discrimination, 30 (9.23%) for pity and 63 (19.38%) other
opinions (P <0.05). Our study was a pioneer to show that nearly one in fourteen
healthy individuals would prefer not to receive the diagnosis of cancer (7.4%).
Factors associated with this preference were schooling level, purchasing power,
job occupation and age range. An expressive 27.51% of respondents believe there
is a reason to omit the diagnosis of cancer to a patient. Further investigations
are required to improve the effectiveness in the communication between
clinicians and potential patients.
Key words:
Cancer diagnose, diagnose disclosure, bad news.
This is an open access article
published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
properly cited.
Cite this article as:
de Paula BHR, Almeida RO, Millen EC, Coutinho FMF, Silva IMSC, Almeida FCO (2018).
Interview in a random and not ill population: If you have cancer would you like
to know?. Acad. J. Environ. Sci. 6(9): 207-214.